Isaac Newton y el problema de la acción a distancia

John Henry

Resumen


La acción a distancia se ha considerado muy a menudo como un medio de explicación inaceptable en la física. Debido a que daba la impresión de resistirse a los intentos de asignarle causas propias a los efectos, la acción a distancia se ha proscrito como sinsentido ocultista. El rechazo de la acción a distancia fue el principal precepto del aristotelismo que fue tan dominante en la filosofía natural europea, y hasta hoy permanece como un prejuicio principal de la física moderna. No obstante, hubo un período de interregno; un período durante el cual las acciones a distancia eran fácilmente aceptadas por un número ignificativo de filósofos naturales. La principal influencia sobre este nuevo enfoque radical hacia la naturaleza de la causalidad física fue, por supuesto, Isaac Newton. El principio de gravitación universal de Newton a muchos les pareció dar no sólo un ejemplo innegable de una fuerza cuya naturaleza no se podía producir por ningún tipo de contacto mecánico entre los cuerpos, sino también un modelo para otras supuestas fuerzas que podían suponerse que dan cuenta de los fenómenos químicos, biológicos y otros fenómenos físicos. Por tanto, durante el siglo XVIII, como lo han demostrado un gran número de importantes estudios históricos, los filósofos naturales buscaron hacer fructífero el deseo de Newton, expresado en el Prefacio a los Principia, de que todos los fenómenos de la naturaleza fueran explicados en términos de fuerzas atractivas y repulsivas que operan a distancia entre las partículas diminutas de los cuerpos. Sin embargo, en la actualidad el rechazo a la legitimidad de las acciones a distancia es tan grande que una serie de notables especialistas de Newton han insistido en que Newton nunca creyó en la actio in distans y que fue completamente malentendido por la generación que le sucedió. Este artículo reitera que Newton sí creía en la acción a distancia y refuta los argumentos de especialistas recientes que sostienen lo contrario.

Palabras clave


Acción a distancia, gravedad, cualidades ocultas, filosofía mecánica, Richard Bentley, historiografía newtoniana.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Anstey, Peter. The Philosophy of Robert Boyle. London and New York, Routledge, 2000.

Dobbs, B. J. T. “Newton’s Alchemy and his ‘Active Principle’ of Gravitation”, en: Scheurer, P. B. and Debrock, G. (eds), Newton’s Scientific and Philosophical Legacy. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1988, pp. 55-80.

____________. The Janus Faces of Genius. The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Bennett, J. A. “Magnetical Philosophy and Astronomy from Wilkins to Hooke”, en: Taton, R. and Wilson, C. (eds.). Planetary Astronomy from the Renaissance to the Rise of Astrophysics, Part A: Tycho Brahe to Newton. Cambridge, Cambridge University press, 1989, pp. 222-30.

Bentley, Richard. A Confutation of Atheism from the Origin and Frame of the World. London, 1693.

Cohen, I. B. “Newton’s Third Law and Universal Gravitation”, en: Journal of the History of Ideas, 48, 1987, pp. 571-93.

____________. “The Principia, Universal Gravitation, and the ‘Newtonian Style’, in relation to the Newtonian Revolution in Science: Notes on the Occasion of the 250th Anniversary of Newton’s Death”, en: Bechler, Z (ed.). Contemporary Newtonian Research. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1982, pp. 21-108.

____________. The Newtonian Revolution: With Illustrations of the Transformation of Scientific Ideas. Cambridge, Cambridge University press 1980.

Copenhaver, Brian P. “The Occultist Tradition and Its Critics”, en: Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 454-512.

Cudworth, Ralph. A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality. Edited Sarah Hutton, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Dear, Peter. “Totius in verba: Rhetoric and Authority in the Early Royal Society”, en: Isis, 76 (1985), 145-61.

Force, James E. “Newton’s God of Dominion: The Unity of Newton’s Theological, Scientific, and Political Thought”, en: Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H (eds.). Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton’s Theology. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1990, pp. 75-102.

Funkenstein, Amos. Theology and the Scientific Imagination: From the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1986.

Gal, Ofer. Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures: Hooke, Newton and the “Compounding of the Celestiall Motions of the Planetts”. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2002.

Grant, Edward (ed.). A Sourcebook in Medieval Science. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1974.

____________. God and Reason in the Middle Ages. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

____________. Much ado about Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1981.

____________. The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages: Their Religious, Institutional and Intellectual Contexts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Alexander, H. G. (ed.). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1956.

Hall, A. Rupert. Henry More: Magic, Religion and Experiment. Oxford, Blackwell, 1990.

____________. The Scientific Revolution. London, Longman, 1962.

____________. The Revolution in Science, 1500-1750. London, Longman, 1983.

Heimann, Peter M. y McGuire, J. E. “Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth-Century Thought”, en: Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3, 1971, pp. 233-306. pp.

-420.

Henry, John, “Animism and Empiricism: Copernican Physics and the Origins of Gilbert’s Experimental Method”, en: Journal of the History of Ideas, 62, 2001, pp. 99-119.

____________. “Causation”, en: Ferngren, Gary (ed.). Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002, pp. 130-42.

____________. “England”, en: Porter, R. y Teich, M. (eds.). The Scientific Revolution in National Context. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 178-210.

____________. “Henry More versus Robert Boyle: The Spirit of Nature and the Nature of Providence”, en: Hutton, Sarah (ed.). Henry More (1614-1687): Tercentenary Studies. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1990, pp. 55-75.

____________. “National Styles in Science: A Factor in the Scientific Revolution?” en: Livingstone, David, N. and Withers, Charles W. J. (eds.). Geography and Revolution. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 43-74.

Hiscock, W. G. (ed.). David Gregory, Isaac Newton and their Circle: Extracts from David Gregory’s Memoranda, 1677-1708. Oxford, for the editor, 1937.

Koyré, Alexandre. “Gravity an Essential Property of Matter?” en: ídem. Newtonian Studies. London, Chapman and Hall, 1965.

Kubrin, David. “Newton and the Cyclical Cosmos: Providence and the Mechanical Philosophy”, en: Journal of the History of Ideas, 28, 1967, pp. 325-46.

Levi, Anthony. Renaissance and Reformation: The Intellectual Genesis. New Haven, Yale University Press, 2002, pp. 40-67.

Lovejoy, A. O. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1936.

Van Lunteren, F. H.. “Gravitation and Nineteenth-Century Physical Worldviews”, en: Scheurer, P. B. and Debrock, G (eds.). Newton’s Scienti c and Philosophical Legacy. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1988, pp. 161-73.

____________. “Gravitation and Nineteenth-Century Physical Worldviews”, en: Scheurer, P. B. and Debrock, G (eds.). Newton’s Scientific and Philosophical Legacy. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1988, pp. 161-73.

McCann, Edwin. “Lockean Mechanism”, en: Holland, A. J (ed.). Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1985, pp. 209-29.

McGuire, J. E. “Atoms and the ‘Analogy of Nature’: Newton’s Third Rule of Philosophizing”. en: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 1 (1970), 3-57.

____________. “Boyle’s Conception of Nature”, en: Journal of the History of Ideas, 33, 1972, pp.523-42.

____________. “Force, Active Principles and Newton’s Invisible Realm”, en: Ambix, 15, 1968, pp. 154-208.

McMullin, Ernan, Newton on Matter and Activity. Notre Dame and London, University of Notre Dame Press, 1978.

Newton, Isaac. Four Letters from Sir Isaac Newton to Doctor Bentley containing some Arguments in Proof of a Deity. London, 1756 (reimpreso en: Cohen, I. B. (ed.) Isaac Newton’s Papers & Letters on Natural Philosophy, 2a edición. Cambridge, Mass. and London, Harvard University Press, 1978, pp. 279-312).

____________. Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, In ections & Colours of Light, basada en la 4ta edición (Londres, 1730), New York, Dover 1979.

____________. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trad. Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, Anne. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1999.

Oakley, Francis. Omnipotence, Covenant and Order: An Excursion in the History of Ideas from Abelard to Leibniz. Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press, 1984.

Pumfrey, Stephen. “Magnetical Philosophy and Astronomy, 1600-1650”, en: Taton, R. and Wilson, C (eds.). Planetary Astronomy from the Renaissance to the Rise of Astrophysics, Part A: Tycho Brahe to Newton. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 45-53.

Schofield, Robert E. Mechanism and Materialism: British Natural Philosophy in an Age of Reason. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1970.

Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1985.

____________. “Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz- Clarke Disputes”, en: Isis, 72 (1981): 187-215.

Shapiro, Alan E. “La ‘filosofía experimental’ de Newton”, en: Estudios de Filosofía, no 35, 2007, pp. 105-141.

Snobelen, Stephen. “William Whiston, Isaac Newton and the Crisis of Publicity”, en: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35 (2004): 573-603.

Stephenson, Bruce. Kepler’s Physical Astronomy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994.

Thackray, Arnold. Atoms and Powers: An Essay on Newtonian Matter-Theory and the Development of Chemistry. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1970. Turnbull, H.W. et al. (eds.). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, 7 vols,. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1959-71.

Vailati, Ezio. Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.

Westfall, R. S. “Newton and Alchemy”, en: Vickers, Brian (ed.), Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 315-35.

____________. “The Rise of science and the Decline of Orthodox Christianity: A Study of Kepler, Descartes, and Newton”, en: Lindberg, D. C. and Numbers, R. L (eds), God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1986, pp. 218-37.

____________. Force in Newton’s Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. New York, American Elsevier, 1971.

____________. Never At Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980.

____________. “Newton and Alchemy”, en: Vickers, Brian (ed.). Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp.315-335.

Curtis, Wilson. “Euler on action-at-a-distance and Fundamental Equations in Continuum Mechanics”, en: Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, A. E (eds.). The Investigation of Dif cult Things. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 399-42.

Wilson, Margaret Dauler. “Superadded Properties: The Limits of Mechanism in Locke”, y “Superadded Properties: A Reply to M. R. Ayers”, en: Wilson, M. D. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999, pp.196-208 y pp. 209-14.

Yolton, John W., Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford, Blackwell, 1983.


Resumen : 5266 PDF : 370

Métricas de artículo

Cargando métricas ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Esta publicación hace parte del Sistema de Revistas de la Universidad de Antioquia
¿Quieres aprender a usar el Open Journal system? Ingresa al Curso virtual
Este sistema es administrado por el Programa Integración de Tecnologías a la Docencia
Universidad de Antioquia
Powered by Public Knowledge Project