Writing Specialized Genres and its Relation to Disciplinary Identity: A Case Study in Industrial Engineering

Emilce Moreno Mosquera

Abstract


This paper analyses how writing a marketing plan is related to market research work, and how in writing that plan, students get acquainted with disciplinary literacy practices. Data gathered through class observation and interviews held with thirty students in their eighth semester of industrial engineering allowed us to prove the hypothesis that ongoing and authentic writing of specialized genres may help train students not only to better comprehend those genres, but also to develop mental habits or approaches to learning, doing, thinking, and behaving (Gee, 1996), related to their work within their disciplinary domain. We con-clude that situated writing practices may provide some framework to explain how academic genres work, and how knowledge can be reached and built, as well as how to develop identities that benefit learning specific domains.

Keywords


disciplinary literacy; genre; epistemic role of writing; disciplinary identity

References


Artemeva, N. (2005). A time to speak, a time to act. A rhetorical genre analysis of a novice engineer’s calculated risk taking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 389-421.

Artemeva, N. (2009). Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers learning genres of their profession. En Ch. Bazerman, A. Bonini, y D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.

Baillie, C. y Johnson, A. (2008). A threshold model for attitudes in first year engineering students. En Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 129-141). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense publishers.

Bajtín, M. (1985). Estética de la creación verbal. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Ballou, R. (1999). Business logistics management. México: Prentice Hall.

Barton, D. y Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. En D. Barton, M. Hamilton y R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7-14). Londres: Routledge.

Bazerman, Ch. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3-23.

Bazerman, Ch. (2002). Genre and identity: Citizenship in the age of the internet and the age of global capitalism. En R. Coe, L. Lingard y T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 13-37). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Bazerman, Ch. (2011). Genre as social action. En J. Gee y M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Londres: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

Bean, J. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom (2.a ed.). San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.

Berkenkotter, C. y Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge and disciplinary communication: Culture/cognition/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in Ph. D. theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41-56.

Camps, A., y Castelló, M. (2013). La escritura académica en la universidad. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(1), 17-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2013.5590

Carlino, P. (2013). Alfabetización académica diez años después. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 18(57), 355-381. Disponible en http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14025774003.

Cisneros, M. y Olave, G. (2012). Redacción y publicación de artículos científicos: un enfoque discursivo. Bogotá: Editorial ECOE.

Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3.a Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

De Tezanos, A. (2004). Una etnografía de la etnografía. Aproximaciones metodológicas para la enseñanza del enfoque cualitativo-interpretativo para la investigación social. Bogotá: Anthropos.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Funke, J. y Frensch, P. (2007). Complex problem solving: The European perspective —10 years after. En D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems (pp. 25-47). Nueva York: Erlbaum.

Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Londres: Taylor & Francis.

Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student’s rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11(1), 43-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088394011001004

Hamilton, M. (2000). Expanding the new literacy studies: Using photographs to explore literacy as social practice. En D. Barton, M. Hamilton y R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in

context (pp. 16-34). Londres: Routledge.

Hernández-Zamora, G. (2016). Literacidad académica. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Herrington, A. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(4), 331-361.

Hyland, K. (2004 [2000]). Disciplinary discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21, 385-395.

Klein, I. (2007). El taller del escritor universitario. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.

Lamb, Ch., Hair, J. y McDaniel, C. (2011). Marketing (11.a Ed.). México: Cengage Learning.

Latour, B. y Woolgar, S. (1986[1979]). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lea, M. y Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 11(3), 182-199.

Malhotra, N. K. (2008). Investigación de mercados: un enfoque aplicado (5.a Ed.). México: Pearson Educación.

Marinkovich, J., Sologuren, E., y Shawky, M. (2018). The process of academic literacy in Civil Engineering Informatics: An approach to academic writing and its genres in a learning community. Círculo de

Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 74, 195-220.

DOI:10.5209/CLAC.60520

McCutchen, D., Teske, P. y Bankston, C. (2008). Writing and cognition: Implications of the cognitive architecture for learning to write and writing to learn. En C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: history, society, school, individual, text (pp. 554-578). Nueva York y Londres, EE. UU. y Reino Unido: Taylor & Francis.

Moje, E. (2010). “Desarrollo de discursos, literacidades e identidades disciplinares: ¿cuál es su relación con el conocimiento? En G. López-Bonilla y C. Pérez Fragoso (Coords.), Discursos e identidades en contextos de cambio educativo. México: Editorial Plaza y Valdés/ Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.

Montes, M. y López-Bonilla, G. (2017). Literacidad y alfabetización disciplinar: enfoques teóricos y propuestas pedagógicas. Perfiles

Educativos, 39(165), 162-178. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-26982017000100162&lng=es&tlng=es

Narváez-Cardona, E. (2016). Latin-American writing initiatives in Engineering from Spanish-speaking countries. Ilha do Desterro, 69(3), 223-248. https://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n3p223

Natale, L. (Ed.) (2012). En carrera: escritura y lectura de textos académicos y profesionales. Los Polvorines: UNGS.

Navarro, F. (2010). ¿Qué son los géneros profesionales? Apuntes teórico-metodológicos para el estudio del discurso profesional. En Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Letras “Transformaciones culturales. Debates de la teoría, la crítica y la lingüística en el bicentenario”. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Navarro, F. y Revel Chion, A. (2013). Escribir para aprender. Disciplinas y escritura en la escuela secundaria. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Navarro, F. y Aparicio G. (2018). Manual de lectura, escritura y oralidad académicas para ingresantes a la universidad. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

Nesi, H. y Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines. Student writing in higher education. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Nogueira, S. (2003). Manual de lectura y escritura universitarias: prácticas de taller. Buenos Aires: Biblos.

Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125-143.

Pires, S. y Carretero, L. (2007). Gestión de la cadena de suministro. Madrid: McGraw Hill.

Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Prior, P. y Bilbro, R. (2012). Academic enculturation: Developing literate practices and disciplinary identities. En M. Castelló y Ch. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic (pp. 19-31). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Quick, C. (2012). From the workplace to academia: Nontraditional students and the relevance of workplace experience in technical writing pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 230-250.

Rivera-Camino, J. (2009). Dirección de marketing. Fundamentos y aplicaciones (3.a Ed.). España: ESIC Editorial.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Shaw, P. (2000). Towards classifying the arguments in research genres. En A. Trosberg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp. 41-56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Stagnaro, D., y Natale, L. (2015). Géneros y formación ingenieril: de la universidad a la industria. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 8(16), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m8-16.gfiu

Street, B. (2005). At last: Recent applications of new literacy studies in educational contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(4), 417-423.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. y Lindemann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. En A. Johns (Ed.), Genres and the classroom –Multiple perspectives (pp. 105-119). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Universidad de Granada (s. f.). Módulo estadística. Disponible en http://wpd.ugr.es/~bioestad/guia-spss/practica-8/

Wells, G. (1990). Talk about text: Where literacy is learned and taught. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(4), 369-405.

Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive process used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87.

Winsor, D. (1990). Engineering writing/writing engineering. College Composition and Communication, 41(1), 58-70.

Winsor, D. (1996). Writing well as a form of social knowledge. En A. H. Duin y J. Hansen (Eds.), Nonacademic writing: social theory and technology (pp. 157-172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Winsor, D. A. (1999). Genre and activity systems. The role of documentation in maintaining and changing engineering activity systems. Written Communication, 16(2) 200-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088399016002003

Winsor, D. A. (2003). Writing power: Communication in an engineering center. Nueva York: State University of New York Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n02a04 Abstract : 244 PDF (Español (España)) : 281

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Esta publicación hace parte del Sistema de Revistas de la Universidad de Antioquia
¿Quieres aprender a usar el Open Journal system? Ingresa al Curso virtual
Este sistema es administrado por el Programa Integración de Tecnologías a la Docencia
Universidad de Antioquia
Powered by Public Knowledge Project