Assessment proposal of teaching and learning strategies in software process improvement

Bell Manrique Losada, Gloria Piedad Gasca Hurtado, María Clara Gómez Alvarez

Abstract


In teaching and learning environments of software process improvement have been incorporated new strategies for helping to decrease current weaknesses related to basic-sciences formation, motivation, and communication. One of such strategies include the usage of gamification principles for achieving student competencies related to teamwork, problem solving, leadership, and effective communication. For assessing the teaching and learning strategies, it is required to consider the following features: i) the student competencies; ii) the didactic instruments and techniques; and, iii) the satisfaction level of the students, regarding the teaching strategy. In this paper an assessment proposal of teaching and learning strategies in software process improvement is presented with a preliminary validation method based on gamification principles. Finally, a case study for validating a didactic instrument is presented as a pilot of the assessment proposal.


Keywords


Assessment; teaching-learning process; Software Process Improvement;

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. Casallas, J.I. Dávila, J.P. Quiroga. “Enseñanza de la ingeniería de software por procesos instrumentados”.

P. Runeson. “Experiences from teaching PSP for freshmen”. Software Engineering Education and Training, 2001. Proceedings. pp. 98-107.

D.P. Groth, E.L. Robertson. “It's all about process: project-oriented teaching of software engineering”. Software Engineering Education and Training. 2001. Proceedings. pp. 7-17.

D. Dicheva, C. Dichev, G. Agre, G. Angelova. “Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study”. Educational Technology & Society. Vol. 18. No.3. 2010. pp. 1-14.

A.M. Vivar Quintana, A.B. González Rogado, A.B. Ramos Gavilán, I.R. Martín, M. Ascensión, R. Esteban, J.F. Martín Izard. “Application of rubric in learning assessment: a proposal of application for engineering students”. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality. 2013. pp. 441-446.

United States Department of Education. “A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education”. 2006. Washington, D.C.

D. Golden. “Colleges, accreditors seek better ways to measure learning”. Wall Street Journal. 2006. 738027-298.

L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl, B.S. Bloom. “A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives”. 2001. Allyn & Bacon.

A. Dorling, F. McCaffery. “The gamification of SPICE”. Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. 2012. pp. 295-301.

W.L. Honig. “Teaching Successful" Real-World" Software Engineering to the" Net" Generation: Process and Quality Win!” .Software Engineering Education and Training, 2008. Proceedings. pp. 25-32.

G. Taran. “Using games in software engineering education to teach risk management”. Software Engineering Education & Training, 2007. Proceedings. pp. 211-220.

C.M. Zapata, G. Awad-Aubad. “Requirements Game: Teaching Software Project Management”. CLEI Electronic Journal. Vol. 10. No 1. 2007.

R. Raymer. “Gamification: Using Game Mechanics to Enhance eLearning”. September, 2011. http://elearnmag.acm.org. Visit date: February 13, 2015.

M. Wu. “The Magic Potion of Game Dynamics. Lithium Technologies Inc”. February, 2011. http://lithosphere.lithium.com/t5/. Visit date: February 13, 2015.

N. Alart. “La evaluación competencial”. Aula TIC. No. 30. 2010. pp. 1-3.

J. Biggs, C. Tang. “Teaching for Quality Learning at University”. McGraw-Hill and Open University Press. Maidenhead. 2011.

D. Van Metre. “A Learning Theory for Economics Instructional Development”. The Journal of Economic Education. Vol. 7. No. 2. 1976. pp. 95-103.

D. Potocki-Malicet, I. Holmesland, M.T. Estrela, A.M. Veiga-Simao. “The Evaluation of Teaching and Learning”. European Journal of Education. Vol. 34. No. 3. 1999. pp. 299-312.

K. Pratt, R.M. Pallof. “Making the Transition: Helping Teachers to Teach Online”. October, 2000. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED452806. Visit date: February 13, 2015.

B.A. Weinberg, M. Hashimoto, B.M. Fleisher. “Evaluating teaching in higher education”. The Journal of Economic Education. Vol. 40. No. 3. 2008. pp. 227-261.

P. Perrenoud, J. Andreu. “Diez nuevas competencias para enseñar: invitación al viaje”. Ed. Graó. Barcelona. 2007.

M. Rico, J. Coppens, P. Ferreira, H. Sánchez, J.E. Agudo. “Everything Matters: Development of Cross-Curricular Competences in Engineering Through Web 2.0 Social Objects”. Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age. 2013. pp. 139-157.

F. Martínez-Abad, A. A. Chaparro, L. Lizasoain Hernández. “The socioeconomic index in the analysis of large-scale assessments: case study in Baja California (Mexico)”. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. 2014. pp. 461-467.

E. Crawley. “The CDIO Syllabus – A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education”. 2001. http://www.cdio.org/cdio_syllabus_rept/index.html. Visit date: February 13, 2015.

D.S. Rychen, L. Salganik. “Definition and selection of key competences. The INES Compendium, Contributions from the INES Networks and Working Groups”. OECD. 2000. pp. 61-74.

R.J. Marzano, J.S. Kendall. “Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy”. Corwin Press. Portland.2008.

M. Ilahi, L. Cheniti-Belcadhi, R. Braham. “Formal competence-based assessment: on closing the gap between academia and industry”. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. 2014. pp. 581-587.

E. Barberá, E. de Martín. “Portfolio electrónico: aprender a evaluar el aprendizaje”. Editorial UOC. 2009

H. Andrade, Y. Du. “Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment”. Research & evaluation. Vol. 10. No.3. 2005. pp. 1-11

R. Hernández Sampieri, C. Fernández Collado, P. Baptista Lucio. “Metodología de la investigación”. McGraw-Hill. México. 2010. pp. 613.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n77a13 Abstract : 1108 PDF : 1197

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Esta publicación hace parte del Sistema de Revistas de la Universidad de Antioquia
¿Quieres aprender a usar el Open Journal system? Ingresa al Curso virtual
Este sistema es administrado por el Programa Integración de Tecnologías a la Docencia
Universidad de Antioquia
Powered by Public Knowledge Project