Questionnaire to Measure the Participation of Nursing Professionals in Mentoring Students

Agueda Cervera-Gasch, Loreto Macia-Soler, Blanca Torres-Manrique, Desirée Mena-Tudela, Pablo Salas-Medina, María Isabel Orts-Cortes, Víctor M González-Chordá

Abstract


Objective. The aim herein was to validate a questionnaire to measure the level of participation of clinical nursing professionals in the mentorship of nursing students during clinical practices.

Methods. Design and validation of a questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the tool were determined through four phases: 1- literature review; 2- evaluation of content validity; 3- pilot test, cognitive pretest and intra-observer reliability study; 4- construct validity study through an exploratory factor analysis of main components with varimax rotation in a sample of 249 nursing professionals from primary care and hospital care from different Spanish provinces. The internal consistency was studied with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient.

Results. The global content validity was above 0.8. The final version of the questionnaire had 33 items, with a global intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.852 and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.837. Factor analysis explained 55.4% of the total variance, with a solution of five factors that made up the dimensions: Implication, Motivation, Satisfaction, Obstacles, and Commitment.

Conclusion. The questionnaire evaluated has adequate validity and reliability to permit determining the level of nurse participation in the mentorship of students.

 

Desctriptors: nursing education; clinical clerkship; mentors; validation studies.


References


(1) Maciá-Soler ML, González Chordá VM, Salas

Medina P, Mena Tudela D, Cervera Gasch Á, Orts

Cortés MI. Level of involvement of clinical nurses in

the evaluation of competence of nursing students.

Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2014; 32(3):461-70.

(2) Chen Y, Watson R, Hilton A. A review of mentorship

measurement tools. Nurse Educ. Today. 2016;

:20-8.

(3) Dobrowolska B, McGonagle I, Kane R, Jackson

CS, Kegl B, Bergin M, et al. Patterns of clinical

mentorship in undergraduate nurse education:

A comparative case analysis of eleven EU and

non-EU countries. Nurse Educ. Today. 2016;

:44-52.

(4) Skela-Savič B, Kiger A. Self-assessment of clinical

nurse mentors as dimensions of professional

development and the capability of developing

ethical values at nursing students: A correlational

research study. Nurse Educ. Today. 2015;

(10):1044-51.

(5) Webb C, Shakespeare P. Judgements about

mentoring relationships in nurse education.

Nurse Educ. Today. 2008; 28(5):563-71.

(6) Jokelainen M, Turunen H, Tossavainen K,

Jamookeeah D, Coco K. A systematic review of

mentoring nursing students in clinical placements.

J. Clin. Nurs. 2011; 20(19-20):2854-67.

(7) Moseley LG, Davies M. What do mentors find

difficult? J. Clin. Nurs. 2008; 17(12):1627-34.

(8) Perry RN. Role modeling excellence in clinical

nursing practice. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2009;

(1):36-44.

(9) Jokelainen M, Jamookeeah D, Tossavainen K,

Turunen H. Finnish and British mentors’ conceptions

of facilitating nursing students’ placement learning

and professional development. Nurse Educ. Pract.

; 13(1):61-7.

(10) Edo-Gual M, Tomás-Sábado J, Bardallo-Porras D,

Monforte-Royo C. The impact of death and dying

on nursing students: an explanatory model. J.

Clin. Nurs. 2014; 23(23-24):3501-12.

(11) Darlow B, Coleman K, McKinlay E, Donovan S,

Beckingsale L, Gray B, et al. The positive impact

of interprofessional education: a controlled trial

to evaluate a programme for health professional

students. BMC Med. Educ. 2015; 15:98.

(12) Heaslip V, Scammell JM. Failing underperforming

students: the role of grading in practice assessment.

Nurse Educ. Pract. 2012; 12(2):95-100.

(13) Wilkes Z. The student-mentor relationship: a

review of the literature. Nurs. Stand. 2006 May

-30; 20(37):42-7.

(14) Ownby K, Schumann R, Dune L, Kohne D. A

comparison of a traditional clinical experience to

a precepted clinical experience for baccalaureateseeking nursing students in their second semester.

Nurs. Res. Pract. 2012; 2012:276506.

(15) Broadbent M, Moxham L, Sander T, Walker S,

Dwyer T. Supporting bachelor of nursing students

within the clinical environment: perspectives

of preceptors. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2014;

(4):403-9.

(16) Wink D, Ruland JP. Multiagency Online Preceptor

Education: Design, Implementation, and Outcomes.

Nurse Educ. 2016; 41(5):270-3.

(17) Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an

acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal

and recommendations. Res. Nurs. Health. 2007;

(4):459–67.

(18) Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13, on the

Protection of Personal Data núm. 298, de 14

December 1999. Spain. Available from https://www.

boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-1999-23750

(19) Johnson KV. Improving Adjunct Nursing Instructors’

Knowledge of Student Assessment in Clinical

Courses. Nurse Educ. 2016; 41(2):108-10.

(20) Ruzafa-Martinez M, Lopez-Iborra L, MorenoCasbas T, Madrigal-Torres M. Development and

validation of the competence in evidence based

practice questionnaire (EBP-COQ) among nursing

students. BMC Med. Educ. 2013; 13:19.

(21) Bray L, Nettleton P. Assessor or mentor? Role

confusion in professional education. Nurse Educ.

Today. 2007; 27(8):848–55.

(22) Vizcaya-Moreno MF, Pérez-Cañaveras RM, De Juan

J, Saarikoski M. Development and psychometric

testing of the Clinical Learning Environment,

Supervision and Nurse Teacher evaluation scale

(CLES+T): the Spanish version. Int. J. Nurs. Stud.

; 52(1):361-7.

(23) Watson PB, Seaton P, Sims D, Jamieson I,

Mountier J, Whittle R, et al. Exploratory factor

analysis of the Clinical Learning Environment,

Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES+T).

J. Nurs. Meas. 2014; 22(1):164-80.

(24) Chow SK, Wong LT, Chan YK, Chung TY. The

impact and importance of clinical learning

experience in supporting nursing students in endof-life care: cluster analysis. Nurse Educ. Pract.

; 14(5):532-7.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v35n2a07 Abstract : 2520 PDF : 2111 HTML English : 232 HTML Español : 548 VIDEO : 63

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Esta publicación hace parte del Sistema de Revistas de la Universidad de Antioquia
¿Quieres aprender a usar el Open Journal system? Ingresa al Curso virtual
Este sistema es administrado por el Programa Integración de Tecnologías a la Docencia
Universidad de Antioquia
Powered by Public Knowledge Project